Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1277 WP No. 24551 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 24551 OF 2021 (GM-FOR) BETWEEN:
MADANRAJ NAHAR S/O DHANRAJ NAHAR, AGED 68 YEARS, NO 33, 1ST CROSS, NEHRUNAGAR, BENGALURU-560 020. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. ANAGHA JAYAPRAKASH., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SRINIVAS.S.V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE RANGER FOREST OFFICER, KAGGALIPURA RANGE, KAGGALIPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-560 082.
2.
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1277 WP No. 24551 of 2021
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Smt.Anagha Jayaprakash., counsel on behalf of Sri.Srinivas.S.V., for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel Smt.Anagha Jayaprakash., submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 55