[2025:RJ-JP:35312] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 13119/2024 Rajveer S/o Puranmal, R/o Kothi Ki Dhani, Sipopsinghpura, Police Station Pragpura, Tehsil Pawta, District Jaipur (Raj.) (Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Kotputali). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 22/08/2025 1. This third application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Rajveer S/o Puranmal, in FIR No. 517/2022 dated 11.09.2022 registered at P.S. Pragpura, District - Jaipur, whereby the applicant-accused was charged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 302 of IPC. 2. The applicant was arrested on 13.09.2022 and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that first bail application of present petitioner accused was dismissed as withdrawn on 21.03.2024 whereas second bail application was dismissed on 25.04.2024 on merits. He further submitted that the petitioner accused is in custody since his arrest on 13.09.2022 and after 3 years the trial has not [2025:RJ-JP:35312] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13119/2024] concluded. He further submitted that till filing of the bail application 15 witnesses were examined by trial court and still there is long list of witnesses and the trial is not likely to be concluded soon. He further submitted that co-accused Suman, Kalu Ram and Lal Chand were granted bail by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court on 31.07.2023. Learned counsel has further submitted that the there are two set of witnesses, as one set points out role and involvement of present petitioner whereas other denied the role and involvement of present petitioner and name other person in the incident. He further submitted that as per post-mortem report (PMR), deceased has sustained one head injury and same is not dangerous to life. He submitted that from one assault intention to commit murder is not proved. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor and he submitted that as per status report received from learned trial court, 20 witnesses were listed by prosecution and by the time the trial would have been concluded. 5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 6. On the basis of report lodged by complainant Satish Panwar about incident of 11.09.2022 for assault by Rajveer, Lal Chand and others on his father Jagdish Panwar, the matter is investigated. During investigation post-mortem of Jagdish was conducted and after investigation a charge-sheet has been filed against Rajveer, Kalu Ram, Lal Chand and Suman. [2025:RJ-JP:35312] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13119/2024] Three accused persons Kalu Ram, Lal Chand and Suman were granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 31.07.2023 7. A status report is called from the trial court while considering first bail application of petitioner accused then it was revealed that 20 witnesses were listed by prosecution. At the time of filing of current bail application 15 witnesses were already examined and during pendency of this bail application may be all other witnesses were examined. It means that the trial is at fag end and likely to conclude very soon. 8. The evidence on record as referred by learned counsel is considered by us. The allegation upon present petitioner is for causing a deadly assault on head of Jagdish with a sharp edged weapon (axe). If there are two sets of evidence one pointing finger towards present petitioner and other towards other then it is a subject matter to be considered at the time of final adjudication but this is not a ground to release present petitioner on bail, who is main accused in the instant case. 9. Hence, the this bail application preferred by petitioner accused-Rajveer S/o Puranmal, is hereby dismissed. 10. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude as early as possible. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /3