Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32176 (ALL)

SUNIL KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/9283/2025 · 2025-03-23

Vikas Budhwar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:42313 Court No. - 73 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9283 of 2025 Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Pandey Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bhanu Pratap Pal,Manish Kumar Pal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J. 1. Heard Sri Bhanu Pratap Pal, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Jyoti Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. In view of the order, which is being proposed to be passed, notices are not being issued to O.P. No. 2. 3. The sole prayer made in the present application is to direct the court below to decide the Complaint Case No.184 of 2023 (Sunil Kumar Pandey Vs. Vishwa Deepak Sharma (@ Sudeep Sharma) Under Section 138 N.I. Act, Police Station-Sujanganj, District- Jaunpur, pending in the court of Additional Civil Judge (J.D.), First, Jaunpur expeditiously within stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court. 4. Learned A.G.A. submits that has no objection to the same. 5. Considering the rival parties, the application stands disposed of requiring the court below to decide the said proceedings after hearing the respective parties with most expedition, preferably within a period of six months, without granting unnecessary adjournment that too not beyond a period of 10 days at a stretch, subject to legal impediment. 6. Passing of this order may not be construed that this Court has adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 24.3.2025 N.S.Rathour (Vikas Budhwar, J) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad