Anil Kumar vs. State of H.P. Cr.MP(M) No.1666 of 2025 17.07.2025 Present: Ms. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, vice Mr. Sunny Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Tejasvi Sharma, Mr. Mohinder Zharaick & Mr. Varun Chandel Additional Advocates General for the respondent/State. Cr.MP(M) No.1666 of 2025 1. By way of the present application, filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, delay of 66 days, in filing the accompanying revision petition has been sought to be condoned. 2. In view of the no objection made by learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the respondent, delay in filing the revision petition is ordered to be condoned. 3. The application is, thus, disposed of. Cr. Revision No. ……of 2025 4. Vide order of even date, passed in Cr.MP(M) No. 1666 of 2025, delay in filing the present revision petition has been ordered to be condoned. 5. Be registered. 6. Service is complete. 7. Certain arguable points are involved in the present petition, as such, present Criminal Revision Petition is ordered to be admitted for hearing. 8. Call for the records. Cr.MPST No.6158 of 2025 9. Petitioner-applicant has filed the accompanying revision petition against the judgment dated 29.01.2025, passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hamirpur, District Hamirpur, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Appellate Court’), in Criminal Appeal Filing No.670 of 2024, titled as Anil Kumar versus State of H.P. Vide judgment dated 29.01.2025, the learned Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner-applicant, against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, dated 07.05.2024, passed by the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.1, Hamirpur, District Hamirpur, H.P., (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial Court’), in Criminal Case No.92-II-2016, titled as State of H.P. versus Anil Kumar. 10. Vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence, dated 07.05.2024, the learned trial Court, has convicted the petitioner-applicant for the offence punishable under Sections 279, 337, 338 of Indian Penal Code and Section 185 of Motor Vehicles Act and sentenced him, as under:- Offence Imprisonment Fine In default of payment of fine amount Section 279 SI for 6 months Rs.1,000/- To further undergo SI for 1 month Section 337 SI for 6 months Rs.500/- To further undergo SI for 1 month Section 338 SI for 2 years Rs.1,000/- To further undergo SI for 1 month 11. Since the disposal of the revision, filed by the petitioner-applicant, against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, as referred to herein-above, will take sufficient long time, as such, the order of sentence dated 07.05.2024, is suspended during the pendency of the revision, subject to the following conditions: (i) That the applicant shall furnish personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-, along with one surety of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks from today, with an undertaking that in the event of final dismissal of the revision petition, he will surrender before the learned trial Court to serve the remainder substantive sentence; ii) That the applicant shall deposit the fine amount, which shall be in addition to the amount, if any, already deposited by the applicant; iii) Applicant shall not leave the territory of India without the prior permission of the Court. 12. The application is, thus, disposed of. 13. A copy of this order be sent to the learned trial Court, with the direction that the report of compliance of this order be submitted to this Court within a period of eight weeks. (Virender Singh) Judge July 17, 2025 (subhash)