Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32170 (RAJ)

DAYANAND S/O SHRI DHARAM PAL v. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS

CW/18015/2019 · 2025-03-26

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:13766] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18015/2019 Dayanand S/o Shri Dharam Pal, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village And Post Nimoth Via Dahina, District Rewari (Haryana) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Secretary, Ministry Of Railways, Room No. 239, Rail Bhawan, Raisina Marg, New Delhi-110001 2. Chairman, Railway Board, 256-A, Raisina Marg, Rajpath Area, Central Secretariat, New Delhi-110001 3. Director General, Railway Protection Force, Security Directorate, Room No. 440, Rail Bhawan, Raisina Marg, New Delhi-110001 4. General Manager (Gm), North Western Railway, Near Jawahar Circle, Jaipur-302017 5. Inspector General Cum Principal Chief Security Commissioner, North Western Railway, Near Jawahar Circle, Jaipur-302017 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Y C Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 26/03/2025 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon judgment dated 15.06.2017 passed by Gauhati High Court titled as Biswarup Mukherjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. in Writ Petition (C) No.6356/2011. Further, learned counsel has made a limited prayer, that the petitioner be allowed to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file a representation while [2025:RJ-JP:13766] (2 of 2) [CW-18015/2019] relying upon the afore-cited judgment, stating the vital aspects for consideration, before the appropriate authority. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that petitioner has submitted his resignation letter and the same is already accepted. Therefore, representation at this nascent juncture will be a mere illusion. Heard and considered. In light of the foregoing facts and circumstances, this Court is of the view that it is the discretion of the petitioner to withdraw the petition, and avail the remedy of filing a representation. Hence, the same cannot be deprived off. However, respondents will be at liberty to pass appropriate order as deemed essential, in accordance with law. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/225