1 2025:CGHC:31214 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3457 of 2025 Panku Ram Netam S/o Late Budhram Netam Aged About 48 Years President Chhattisgarh Sarv Aadiwasi Samj, R/o Vill- Bolbola, Post- Kokodi, Tahsil And District- Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Its Chief Secretari, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Collector And President Zila Nirman Samiti, District- Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer Rural Engineering Services, Sub Division, Kondagaon, District- Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Deputy Engineer Rural Engineering Services, Sub Division, Kondagaon, District- Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Bangaram Sodi Ex- President Chhattisgarh. Sarv Aadiwasi Samj, Tahsil And District- Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Love Kumar Ramteke, Advocate For State : Ms. Akanksha Verma Dabhadker, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 08/07/2025 VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2025.07.08 17:17:12 +0530 2 Heard. 1. The petitioner has been filed this writ petition on the following relief(s) : “10.1. That, the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to call for the entire records from the respondents. 10.2. That, the Hon'ble Court may please issue an appropriate writ for handing over the building and complex to the registered organization. 10.3. That, the Hon’ble court may kindly issur direction to the Collector, respondent No.2 for immediate disposal of the AnnexureP/1. 10.4. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief or pass such other and further orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner contended that the petitioner is the unanimously elected district president of the district unit of the registration organization Chhattisgarh. Which is Chhattisgarh Sarva Adivasi Samaj registration number 4230. Respondent no.5 is no longer the District President. He further submits that Respondent No. 5 is not giving the said building and premises to the registered organization only for the purpose of 3 earning profit for itself. The any social building and complex constructed with government grant is given only to a registered organization. Without prejudice to the above and for the sake of brevity, the averment mention in the para 8 of the petition may also be treated grounds of the petition. 3. Learned State counsel not opposes the submission made by learned counsel for the State. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused record. 5. Considering the facts of the case and submission made by counsel for the respective respondents, at this stage, this writ petition is disposed of directing to Respondent No.2 to consider and decide letter dated 04.06.2025 (Annexure P/1) submitted by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with relevant rules, regulations and law. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant