Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32169 (CAL)

INZAMUL ISLAM @ ANZAMAMUL ISLAM v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1037/2025 · 2025-09-03

Suvra Ghosh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

September 3, 2025 24 ARDR (Allowed) CRM (M) 1037 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Amdanga Police Station Case No. 597 of 2024 dated 28/8/2024 under Sections 329(4)/115(2)/117(2)/324(4)/118(2)/109/351(2B)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 25(i)(a)/27/35 of the Arms Act. And In Re : Inzamul Islam @ Anzamamul Islam ... Petitioner. Adv. Biswajit Manna ... for the petitioner. Adv. Bitasok Banerjee, Adv. Tapas Kumar Saha, ... for the State. The petitioner seeks parity with the co-accused who have been granted bail earlier. Learned counsel for the State does not oppose the said fact except that the petitioner has three criminal antecedents to his credit. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been granted bail in the said cases. In view of the fact that the petitioner is similarly circumstanced with the co-accused who have been granted bail earlier, he deserves the same benefit. Accordingly the prayer for bail is allowed. The petitioner namely Inzamul Islam @ Anzamamul Islam be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barasat subject to the condition that he shall not enter the jurisdiction of Amdanga Police Station and shall 2 furnish the address where he shall henceforth reside before the learned trial Court, Investigating officer and the officer in charge of the concerned police station under whose jurisdiction he shall presently reside. The petitioner shall appear before the learned trial Court on every date of hearing. He shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever. In the event the petitioner fails to adhere to any of the conditions stated above without any justifiable cause, the learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court. The application for bail is disposed of. Case Diary be returned. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)