Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010473242024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4147/2024 Between:
1. T SIVA REDDY, S/O LATE T PANAKALA REDDY, AGED 58 YEARS OCC EXECUTIVE OFFICER GRADELL
R/O KOTHAPETA SIVALAYAM KOTHAPET, GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522 001
...PETITIONER AND
1. S SATYANARAYANA I A S, The Principal Secretary , Revenue (Endowments) Department Velagapudi, Guntur District.
...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent under Sections 10 to 12 of The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for wilful violation, flouting and disobeying the orders of this Hon'ble Court in WP 33030/2023 dated 23.12.2023 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA
The Court made the following ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri M. Raghu Nandan, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri D.V. Sasidhar, Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner and Sri Ramalingeswara Rao Kocharla Kota, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
2. Ld. Counsel for the Respondent has submitted the Memo No.REV- 36021/86/2017-END 1–REV, Dated: 27.01.2025 issued by the sole Respondent.
3. As it can be noticed from the record that, this Court has passed an Order on 23.12.2023 with certain directions. But the compliance has been done by the sole Respondent only on 27.01.2025, which is after more than one year. Although, this Court is inclined to close this Contempt Petition, this Court is rather constrained to take judicial note of the gross delay on the part of the Contemnor in issuing the Memo dated: 27.01.2025 mentioned above.
4. With these observations, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Needless to state that the Contempt Petitioner is at liberty to challenge the above mentioned Memo.
5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 03.02.2025 Mnr
60
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
CONTEMPT CASE No.4147 OF 2024
Dt.03.02.2025 Mnr