Paras Ram vs. H.P. State Co-operative Bank Cr.MP(M) No.1662 of 2025 17.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sandeep Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Abhijeet Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Manoj Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. Cr.MP(M) No.1662 of 2025 1. By way of the present application, filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, delay of 27 days, in filing the accompanying revision petition has been sought to be condoned. 2. In view of the no objection made by learned vice counsel appearing for the respondent, delay in filing the revision petition is ordered to be condoned. 3. The application is, thus, disposed of. Cr. Revision No. ……of 2025 4. Vide order of even date, passed in Cr.MP(M) No. 1662 of 2025, delay in filing the present revision petition has been ordered to be condoned. 5. Be registered. 6. Service is complete. 7. Certain arguable points are involved in the present petition, as such, present Criminal Revision Petition is ordered to be admitted for hearing. 8. Call for the records. Cr.MPST No.6351 of 2025 9. Petitioner-applicant has filed the accompanying revision petition against the judgment dated 12.03.2025, passed by the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Sirmaur, District at Nahan, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Appellate Court’), in Criminal Appeal No.149-Cr.A/10 of 2022, titled as Paras Ram versus Himachal Pradesh State Co-operative Bank. Vide judgment dated 12.03.2025, the learned Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner-applicant, against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, dated 27.09.2022, passed by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Rajgarh, District Sirmaur, H.P., (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial Court’), in CIS Case No.223 of 2015, titled as H.P. State Co- operative Bank versus M/s V.V.M. Communication & another. 10. Vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence, dated 27.09.2022, the learned trial Court, has convicted the petitioner-applicant for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment, for a period of one year and to pay a compensation of Rs.3,90,000/-. 11. Since the disposal of the revision, filed by the petitioner-applicant, against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, as referred to herein-above, will take sufficient long time, as such, the order of sentence dated 27.09.2022, is suspended during the pendency of the revision, subject to the following conditions: (i) That the applicant shall furnish personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-, along with one surety of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks from today, with an undertaking that in the event of final dismissal of the revision petition, he will surrender before the learned trial Court to serve the remainder substantive sentence; ii) That the applicant shall deposit 30% of the amount of compensation, with the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks from today, which shall be in addition to the amount, if any, already deposited by the applicant. iii) Applicant shall not leave the territory of India without the prior permission of the Court. 12. The application is, thus, disposed of. 13. A copy of this order be sent to the learned trial Court, with the direction that the report of compliance of this order be submitted to this Court within a period of eight weeks. (Virender Singh) Judge July 17, 2025 (subhash)