Kathari Chakradhara Rao, v. State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/24098/2025 · 2025-09-09
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32154 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32154 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010471892025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 24098/2025 Between:
1. KATHARI CHAKRADHARA RAO,, S/O. MAHALAKSHMI AGE 67 YEARS, R/O.D. NO. 10-516/2, 5TH STREET, APSP, RAMANAYYAPETA, KAKINADA-533005. 2. KATHARI SOMANNA,, S/O. MAHALAKSHMI AGE 55 YEARS, R/O.D.NO. 10-516/2, 5TH STREET,
APSP, RAMANAYYAPETA, KAKINADA-533005. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKINADA
KAKINADA DISTRICT
3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER CUM SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 4. TAHASILDAR, GOLLAPROLU VILLAGE AND MANDAL KAKINADA DISTRICT
5.
KATHARI MADHAV KRISHNA, , S/O. MAHALAKSHMI AGE 70 YEARS, VELAMA STREET, PITHAPURAM ROAD, GORSA VILLAGE, U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring that the action of the 3rd respondent in not disposing the Appeal G/606/2025 with respect to the lands of the petitioners in S.No. 101 of Chebrolu Village, Gollaprolu Mandal, Kakinada District as arbitrary illegal unsustainable in violation of Art 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to dispose Appeal G/606/2025 with respect to the lands of the petitioners in S.No.lOl of Chebrolu Village, Gollaprolu Mandal, Kakinada District within a time frame and grant IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4
2 not to delete the entries from the land title deed Patta No. 355 of the 1st petitioner and the Pattedar Pass Book Patta No.734 of the 2nd petitioner and direct the respondents 2 to 4 to upload the same in the portal of web land -2 pending disposal of the writ petition and grant IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent dispose the Appeal No. G/606/2025 pending before him with respect to the lands of the petitioners in S.No.lOl of Chebrolu Village, Gollaprolu Mandal, Kakinada District pending disposal of the wnt petition and grant Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. M BALANAGA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR REVENUE
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.24098 of 2025
ORDER:-
The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“…to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring that the action of the 3rd respondent in not disposing the Appeal G/606/2025 with respect to the lands of the petitioners in S.No.101 of Chebrolu Village, Gollaprolu Mandal, Kakinada District as arbitrary, illegal, unsustainable in violation of Art 300- A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to dispose Appeal G/606/2025 with respect to the lands of the petitioners in S.No.101 of Chebrolu Village, Gollaprolu Mandal, Kakinada District within a time frame and grant such other order or orders…”
2. Heard Sri M. Bala Naga Srinivas, learned counsel for petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.1 to 4.
3. The petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a direction for expeditious disposal of the appeal registered as Ref.G/606/2025 pending before the 3rd respondent- Revenue Divisional Officer.
4.
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the appellate authority is bound to decide the case in accordance with the law expeditiously.
5. Ergo, this Court directs the 3rd respondent-appellate authority to make an endeavor, or to put to an end, by making all the efforts, in
4 deciding the case with due diligence within a reasonable time for disposal of the appeal on merits and as per law, after hearing all the parties to the dispute, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, not beyond two (02) months from date of receipt of a copy this order.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 10.09.2025 KBN