201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-434-1995 Date of Decision: 15.09.2025 JAI DAYAL ....Appellant Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Abhinav Mahant, AAG, Haryana for respondents No.1 and 2. Parmod Goyal, J. (Oral) Plaintiff/appellant has filed the present Regular Second Appeal challenging the orders dated 25.02.1886, 20.02.1987, 28.08.1986 and 27.01.1987. 2. Admittedly, the said orders were also challenged by the original land owner, who was one of the defendants and all these orders have been quashed by the learned Civil Court and matter now stands referred to learned Collector, Sirsa. It is submitted by learned counsel for appellant that in view of quashing of orders, which was subject matter of present appeal, the present appeal does not survive and he be given liberty to raise all his contentions on behalf of the plaintiff/appellant, who had purchased the land from original land owner out of the permissible area, before the proceedings CHIRANJEEV SINGHbefore Collector. 2025.09.17 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3. In view of the fact that impugned orders which were subject matter of present suit have already been quashed, the present appeal does not survive and is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn with right to plaintiff/appellant to raise all his contentions before the learned Collector, Sirsa, where the matter regarding determination of surplus area in the hands of original owner is under consideration. (PARMOD GOYAL) 15.09.2025 JUDGE chiranjeev Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No CHIRANJEEV SINGH 2025.09.17 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document