Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32151 (JHR)

SANDEEP KUJUR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6764/2025 · 2025-12-08

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:36708 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 6764 of 2025 Sandeep Kujur, son of Xavier Kujur, aged about 28 years, resident of village Hariharpur, Jamtoli, Kumbatoli, P.O. Bero, P.S. Bero, District-Ranchi ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Dilip Kr. Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, A.P.P. 02/ 08.12.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Lapung P.S. Case No. 16 of 2025, registered under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 118(2), 121(1), 121(2), 109(1), 132, 324(4), 61(2) and 352 of BNS, 2023 and section 27 of Arms Act, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, XXIX, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that two groups of approximately 50-60 persons were agitating and one of the party has called upon the police thereafter police came at the spot and allegations are made that assault has been made upon the police personnel. He further submits that dispute between the two groups was with regard to land. He also submits that co-accused has been granted bail in A.B.A. No. 6810/2024. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegation of assault is there upon the police personnel. 5. Looking into contents of F.I.R, it transpires that 50-60 persons were assembled and later on 350-400 persons came there and on call police ( 2025:JHHC:36708 ) personnel came at the spot. There is general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons. It is not clear from whose blow injured has received injury and further injury is found to be simple in nature and co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid A.B.A. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the above named, petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, XXIX, Ranchi, in connection with Lapung P.S. Case No. 16 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.08.12.2025 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-