APHC010472662024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4224/2024 Between: 1. TIYYAGURA PRABHAKAR REDDY,, S/O BHASKAR REDDY, R/O FLAT NO. 401, SREE ENCLAVE APARTMENT, HOUSING BOARD COLONY, NALLAPADU ROAD, GUNTUR-522005 ...PETITIONER AND 1. ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT CT IS AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 19.12.20124 VIDE I.A.NO.1 OF 2024 IN C.C.NO.4224 OF 2024 3. HARI NARAYANA M IAS, THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, ANDHRA PRADESH AT PRIME HILL CREST VADDESWARAM, TADEPALLI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. ALEEMBASHA SK, THE MANGALAGIRI -TADEPALLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be to summon, prosecute and punish the respondent U/S 10 to 12 of the contempt of Court Act for willful and deliberate violation of the orders of this Hon’ble Court dated 18-06-2024 in WP No. 10456 of 2024 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to amend the cause title in the Contempt Petition by removing the words “The State of Andhra Pradesh” in the cause title of 1st and 2nd respondents and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KODE RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 3. J DILEEP KUMAR The Court made the following order: In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, the orders disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with, the contempt case is liable to be closed. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS