Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:30156
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6907 of 2025 1 - Ishwar Lal Sahu S/o Prabhu Ram Sahu Aged About 47 Years Presently Posted As Teaacher At Government Middle School, Udkuda, Block- Charama, District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Joint Director Division Education, Bastar, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector, Collector Complex, District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Education Officer, D E O Office, District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Block Education Officer Block Charama, District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Revenue) President Of Block Level Committee Tehsil- Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) WPS No. 7008 of 2025 1 - Siyaram Nishad S/o Ram Kisun Nishad Aged About 48 Years Presently Posted As Teacher At Government Upper Primary School, Kumhankhar, Block- Narharpur, District- North Bastar, Kanker Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner(s) SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.07.04 10:33:26 +0530
2 Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Joint Director Division Education, Bastar, Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Collector Complex, District- North Bastar, Kanker Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Education Officer D E O Officer, District- North Bastar, Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Block Education Officer, Block- Narharpur, District- North Bastar, Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Sub Divisional Magistrate (Revenue) President Of Block Level Committee Tehsil Kanker, District- Bastar Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) WPS No. 6959 of 2025 1 - Kailash Kumar Salame S/o Bise Lal Salame Aged About 49 Years Presently Posted As Teacher At Government Upper Primary School, Saimunda, Block- Narharpur District-North Bastar, Kanker, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Joint Director Divison Education, Bastar Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector Collector Complex, District- North Bastar, Kanker Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer Deo Office, District- North Bastar, Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Block Education Officer Block- Narharpur District- North Bastar, Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Revenue) President Of Block Level Committee Tehsil - Narharpur District- North Bastar, Chhattisgarh. 3
--- Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devashish Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms.
Smita Jha, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.
Order on Board 03/07/2025
1. By way of these writ petitions, the petitioners are challenging the impugned transfer orders and action of the respondents, whereby the petitioners have been declared surplus Teachers and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have not joined at their transferred place. It is further submitted that list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the Rationalization Instructions and the same is arbitrary, as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners, and if the petitioners are not granted relief, they will suffer with irreparable loss.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that the petitioners still want to pursue their representation before the concerned authorities to redress their grievances.
3.
Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records, the petitioners have been transferred under the Rationalization Instructions issued by the State Government. It is further submitted that, if the petitioners are having any grievance, they may move fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee and the Committee will
4 take a decision on their representation, in accordance with law, within a stipulated period.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents.
5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioners are directed to make fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee within a period of 05 days from today, and thereafter, the Committee shall decide the same within a further period of 05 days from the date of receipt of representation, in accordance with law, in objective manner.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petitions stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika