Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32145 (CHH)

RAJSHREE SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3916/2022 · 2025-05-07

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:21379 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3916 of 2022 1 - Rajshree Singh D/o Shri Radha Raman Singh, Aged About 37 Years W/o Shri Abhishek Singh R/o Ward No. 16, Nawapara Ambikapur, Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Sangita Mahapatra W/o Shri P.K. Mahapatra, Aged About 50 Years R/o Mahatma Gandhi Ward No. 18, Bramha Road, In Front Of Saraswati Shishu Mandir, Kena Bandh Chowk, Bauripara Ambikapur, Surguja Chhattisgarh 3 - Jyoti Ambastha D/o Shri Nawal Kishore Sinha, Aged About 49 Years W/o Sanjay Kumar Ambastha, R/o Ward No. 20, D.C. Road, Mahaveer Mandir, Mahaveer Para Ambikapur, Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Varsha Singh Chauhan D/o Shri Rajkumar Singh Chauhan, Aged About 51 Years C/o Sudhir Singh Rana, Agrasen Ward, Kharsiya Road Astbal Bhawan, Ambikapur, Surguja Ambikapur (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Biva Kumari Mishra D/o Shri Kedar Nath Mishra, Aged About 40 Years R/o Kedarpur Ambikapur, Surguja (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Police Station And Post Rakhi, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - The Collector, Ambikapur, Surguja District Ambikapur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Vice Chancellor, National Institute Of Open Schooling, D.El.Ed (For Untrained In Service Teacher) Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Ambikapur, Surguja (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondents YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.05.13 12:11:24 +0530 2 (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For State : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 08.05.2025 1 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that by efflux of time, instant petition has become infructuous. 2 Learned State counsel concurs the submission made by learned counsel on behalf of the petitioners. 3 Accordingly, instant writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh