- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:14837 WP No. 23943 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 23943 OF 2024 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SATHYAMMA, W/O K.R. SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 2. SRI. K.R. SHIVANNA, S/O RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO. E 80/2/120, KANIMINIKE VILLAGE, KUMBALAGUDU, KENGERI HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK - 560 060. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. PUSHPALATHA Y, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KASHINATH J.D, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:14837 WP No. 23943 of 2024 3. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, KHANIJA BHAVANA, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER. 4. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER-2, KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BMICP), NO. 14/3, ARAVINDA BHAVANA, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N, HCGP FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. H.L. PRADEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 PRAYING TO DIRECT TO QUASH NOTIFICATION BEARING NO. CI 196 SPQ 98 DATED 21.07.1999 ISSUED BY R-4 HEREIN UNDER SEC 28(1) OF THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT ACT, 1966 AS PER ANNEXURE-E AS LAPSED, ABANDONED, NON-EST AND NULL AND VOID IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS LAND-SY NO. 91 AND 92, OLD SY NO. 39/P7 AND 39/15 RESPECTIVELY MEASURING 1 ACRE EACH SITUATED AT AVARAGERE GRAMA, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:14837 WP No. 23943 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 07.04.2025 stating that the petitioner does not wish to pursue the matter and therefore, the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27 CT: BHK