Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21662 RFA No. 1424 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1424 OF 2017 (PAR) BETWEEN:
1. SRI. MAHADEVAIAH S/O LATE CHANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
2. SRI. REVANNA S/O LATE CHANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT CHANDRAGIRIDODDI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBALI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-571 511. …APPELLANTS (ABSENT)
AND:
1. SMT. SHIVAMMA D/O LATE CHANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, W/O SAVANDAIAH, R/AT NO. 31/1, RANGAPPA BUILDING, MARAKKA COMPOUND, 1ST MAIN, DEEPANJALI NAGARA, BANGALORE-560 026. 2. SHIVALINGAIAH S/O LATE CHANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21662 RFA No. 1424 of 2017
RESIDING AT CHANDRAGIRIDODDI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-571 511. 3. SMT. SHIVAMMA DEAD BY HER LR'S,
NAGAMMA @ NAGARATHNA @ NAGARATHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, D/O SHIVAMMA,
4. SRINIVASA D/O SHIVAMMA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.139, 4TH CROSS, JANATHA COLONI, HUNASANAHALLI ROAD, RAMANAGARA TOWN-571 511. 5. SMT. SHOBHA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O SAVANDAIAH,
6. MADAMMA W/O CHANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT CHANDRAGIRIDODDI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT-571 511. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D.R.BASAVARAJAPPA., ADVOCATE TO R1 TO 5)
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. - 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21662 RFA No. 1424 of 2017
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
The appeal is listed today for orders and the names of the appellants are printed/ shown in the cause list. The names of the appellants are called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, either personally or through video conferencing. The appellants are absent. Sri.D.R.Basavarajappa., counsel for respondents 1 to 5 has appeared in person. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 19.06.2025, on that day, counsel Sri.Vijay Shetty.B., was permitted to retire from the case and the office was directed to print the names of the appellants in the cause list and it was also ordered to be listed on 23.06.2025.
Accordingly, the appeal is listed today by printing the names of the appellants in the cause list. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in 2017. Now we are in the month of June, 2025. The appeal is pending from eight years. As already noted above, the names of the appellants are called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation on
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21662 RFA No. 1424 of 2017
behalf of the appellants, either personally or through video conferencing. The appellants have not engaged counsel to represent them in the Court. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11