IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 907 of 2025 Date of Decision : 2.7.2026 Suresh ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & ors. ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate. Petitioner present in person. For respondent No.1/State : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. For Respondents No.2 & 3 : Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 2nd July, 2026 (Chander) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.