Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3213 (UTT)

Amrik Singh v. State Of Uttarakhand

WPSB/313/2016 · 2025-08-11

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB/313/2016 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. Mr. Sunil Upadhyay, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Dinesh Bankoti, Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes statement at the bar that writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Subhash Upadhyay,J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 11.08.2025 Mahinder/KKS