Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32129 (PNJ)

NOUSEVA BUILWELL LLP v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/6362/2025 · 2025-08-19

Rohit Kapoor, To Be Nominated

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 121+277 NOUSEVA BUILWELL LLP STATE OF HARYAN CORAM: HON’BLE HON’BLE MR. Present : Mr. Chetan Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Mr Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Ms. Shvetanshu Goel, Advocate for respondent Mr. Deepankur Sharma, Advocate for the applicant/proposed respondent No.5. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA 1. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioners states that on account of subsequent developments including orders passed by the registrat authorities, the petitioner be allowed challenge the subsequent orders 2. Granting liberty as prayed for, this withdrawn. 3. All pending accordingly. AUGUST 19, 2025 Jyoti-IV IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. Date of decision: NOUSEVA BUILWELL LLP Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Chetan Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kunal Mulwani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Ms. Shvetanshu Goel, Advocate for respondent Mr. Deepankur Sharma, Advocate for the applicant/proposed respondent No.5. **** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (oral) Learned Senior counsel for the petitioners states that on account of subsequent developments including orders passed by the registrat the petitioner be allowed to withdraw this challenge the subsequent orders, in the appropriate proceedings Granting liberty as prayed for, this All pending applications, if any, in this case are disposed of (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA (ROHIT KAPOOR AUGUST 19, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.6362 of 2025 Date of decision: 19.08.2025 …. Petitioner …. Respondents ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Chetan Mittal, Sr. Advocate with , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Ms. Shvetanshu Goel, Advocate for respondent No.4. Mr. Deepankur Sharma, Advocate for the applicant/proposed Learned Senior counsel for the petitioners states that on account of subsequent developments including orders passed by the registration to withdraw this petition with liberty to in the appropriate proceedings, if so advised. Granting liberty as prayed for, this petition is dismissed as applications, if any, in this case are disposed of ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) JUDGE ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No Learned Senior counsel for the petitioners states that on account of ion with liberty to as applications, if any, in this case are disposed of ) SURESH KUMAR 2025.08.27 09:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document