Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32125 (HP)

RAVINDER KUMAR v. STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

CRMPM/1686/2025 · 2025-07-21

Rakesh Kainthla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MP(M) No. 1686 of 2025 Date of Decision: 21.07.2025 Ravinder Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the Petitioner : Mr. N.K.Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Divya Raj, Advocate. For the Respondent/ State : Mr. Jitender K. Sharma, Additional Advocate General with DySP/SDPO, Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. Rakesh Kainthla,Judge (Oral) Status report stands filed and the same is taken on record. 2. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that complainant is not present despite the fact that she has been informed about the date of hearing, hence, the matter is being processed further in absence of the informant. 3. Perusal of the status report shows that the police have effected the recovery from the petitioner and no further recovery is to be effected from him. The petitioner is in judicial custody. 2 4. Keeping in view the nature of offences, it is ordered that the petitioner be released on bail subject to his furnishing of personal bonds in the sum of ₹50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Dharamshala (Special Judge), Kangra, H.P. Within a period of two weeks subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner will join the investigation as and when directed to do so. (ii) The petitioner will not intimidate the witnesses, nor will he influence any evidence in any manner whatsoever; (II) The petitioner shall attend the trial on each and every hearing and will not seek unnecessary adjournments in case the presentation of charge-sheet; (III) The petitioner will not leave the present address for a continuous period of seven days without furnishing the address of the intended visit to the SHO concerned, the Police Station concerned and the Trial Court; (IV) The petitioner will surrender his passport, if any, to the Court; and (V) The petitioner will furnish his mobile number and social media contact to the Police and the Court and will abide by the summons/notices received from the Police/Court through SMS/WhatsApp/Social Media Account. In case of any change in the mobile number or social media accounts, the same will be intimated to the Police/Court within five days from the date of the change. 5. The present petition stands disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 21st July, 2025 (Ravinder) 3