1 2025:CGHC:40589 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7755 of 2025 1 - Vikas Sharma S/o Shri B N Sharma, Aged About 39 Years Presently Posted As Government Upper Primary School, Pisaud, Block- Baloda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 495559 ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department of School Education, Government of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh- 492002 2 - Director, Directorate of Public Instruction Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492002 3 - Collector Collector Complex, District Janjgir Champa 495668 4 - Joint Director Education Division, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 495001 5 - District Education Officer Deo Office, District Janjgir Champa 495668 6 - Block Education Officer, Block Baloda, District Janjgir Champa 495559 7 - Block Education Officer Block Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa- 495559 8 - Sub Divisional Magistrate Revenue Division- Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa 495552 ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Devashish Tiwari, Advocate For State/Respondents : Mr. K.S. Saini, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 12-08-2025 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 07.06.2025 (Annexure P/4), whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Govt. Middle School Pisaud, Block Baloda, District Janjgir-Champa to Govt. Middle School Kodvabani, Block Mungeli, District Mungeli under the rationalization instructions. The said transfer order was passed after declaring him surplus there. The petitioner moved his representation on 02.06.2025 to the respondents authorities which is still pending. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible, in objective manner, by passing the reasoned order in view of the grievance raised by the petitioner. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil