1 APHC010471372016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32823/2016 Between: D Kittanna ...PETITIONER AND State Of Ap Prl Scy Icomm Hyd 3 and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C H MURALI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 2. T BALAJI 3. GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE (AP) The Court Made the Following Order:- This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue a Writ order or direction more especially one in the nature of Mandamus to declare the action of the 4th respondent in retiring the petitioner by way of superannuation with effect from 31.1.2016 on attaining 2 the age of 58 years as illegal arbitrary unconstitutional and unreasonable and to direct the 4th respondent to continue the petitioner in service till attaining the age of 60 years with all benefits and to pass...” 2. Sri, C.H.Murali Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J 11.07.2025. ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO.32823 of 2016 11.07.2025 ASR