Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:60569 Court No. - 77 Case :- JAIL APPEAL No. - 256 of 2021 Appellant :- Dinesh Raghav Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Archana Singh,From Jail Counsel for Respondent :- A.G.A. Hon'ble Manoj Bajaj,J. This appeal challenges the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 06.08.2019 passed by Special Court (POCSO Act) 2012/Additional Session Judge, court no.7, Aligarh in Special Sessions Trial No.125 of 2016, titled State of U.P. Vs. Dinesh Raghav, thereby convicting the appellant under Sections 376 read with Section 511 IPC, 452, 506 IPC and U/s 7/8 POCSO Act, 2012, followed by imposition of sentence of six years imprisonment U/s 376 read with Section 511 IPC and 8 POCSO Act, 2012 with fine of Rs.15,000/-, four years imprisonment U/s 452 IPC with fine of Rs.2,500/-, three years imprisonment U/s 506 IPC with fine of Rs.2,500/- with further condition that in the event of non- deposit of fine(s), convict shall undergo further imprisonment of six month, one month and one months, respectively. The applicant-convict was prosecuted through Case Crime No.197 of 2016, under Sections 376, 452, 506, 511 IPC and U/s 7/8 POCSO Act, 2012, registered at Police Station- Gandhi Park, District- Aligarh. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that applicant has been sentenced for commission of different offences, who has been inflicted with a maximum sentence of rigorous imprisonment for six years alongwith fine. Learned counsel submits that after the judgment of conviction dated 6.8.2019, applicant has been sent in custody to serve the sentence and after completion of sentence, the applicant has been released from prison. In view of the above statement, nothing survives for adjudication on merits in this case. Thus, the appeal as well as the application for suspension of sentence are dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 22.4.2025 Raj Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad