VIVEK PARASHAR S/O SH. BHAGWATI PRASAD PARASHAR v. UNION OF INDIA
WRES/1138/2024 · 2025-03-05
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32114 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32114 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:9730] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 1138/2024 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11554/2024
1. Vivek Parashar S/o Sh. Bhagwati Prasad Parashar, Aged About 49 Years, R/o H. No. 5 - Prem Ganpati Nagar, Pushkar Road, Ajmer, Currently Posted As Public Prosecutor And Government Advocate - Dist. And Sessions Court - Ajmer.
2. Rajesh Kumar Inani S/o Sh. Devkishan Inani, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Alakhnanda Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer, Currently Posted As Addl. Pulic Prosecutor No. 02 And Government Advocate - Addl. Dist. And Sessions Court No. 2 -Ajmer.
3. Rajendra Singh Rathore S/o Sh. Laxman Singh Rathore, Aged About 54 Years, R/o H. No. 1425, Kotda Resdential Scheme, Ajmer, Currently Posted As Addl. Public Prosecutor And Government Advocate - Addl. Dist. And Session Court No. 01 Ajmer. ---Applicants-Petitioners Versus
1. Union Of India, Through Its Secretary To Govt. Of India, Ministry Of Law And Justice (Legislative Department), 4Th Floor, A-Wing, Shastri Bhawan New Delhi - 110001.
2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. Principal Secretary - Law, Department Of Law And Legal Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
4. Additional Chief Secretary - Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
5. The Collector And District Magistrate - Ajmer, Collectorate, Civil Lines, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nishita Gambhir for Mr. Javed Khan through V.C. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sunil Shkhawat for Mr. Mohit Balwada HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
[2025:RJ-JP:9730] (2 of 2) [WRES-1138/2024] 05/03/2025
1. Instant restoration application has been filed, seeking restoration of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11554/2024, which came to be dismissed due to non-compliance of peremptory order dated
29.08.2024.
2. Counsel for applicant undertakes to file requisite PF and notices soon after restoration of the writ petition.
3. Taking into consideration the reasons mentioned in the application and undertaking of counsel for applicant to file PF and notices, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the instant application, subject to deposition of cost.
4. Accordingly, the instant restoration application is allowed and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11554/2024 is allowed to be restored to its original number, subject to condition of deposition of a cost of Rs.1,000/- with the Litigants Welfare Fund through Banker’s Cheque/ DD in the name of Registrar General LWFA, Rajasthan High Court within a period of four weeks. Receipt of deposition of cost amount be placed in the file. However, in case of non- deposition of cost amount within the stipulated time period, as
directed hereinabove, the restoration application be treated as dismissed.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J TN/90