Ruppa Lakshminarayana, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/28629/2022 · 2025-08-19
B Krishna Mohan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32110 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32110 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010469952022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 28629/2022 Between:
1. RUPPA LAKSHMINARAYANA,, S/O LATE RUPPA RAMULU, HINDU, AGED 11 YEARS, OCC--AGRICULTURE, R/O SANIVADA VILLAGE AND POST, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL AND DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT OF A.P., VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, SRIKAKULAM.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, , SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHASILDAR, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
5. MANDAL PRAJA PARISHAD OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
6. MANDAL EDUCATION OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
7. SANIVADA GRAM PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, SANIVADA VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
2
8. UNGATI GOPALARAO, , S/O U.NARASANNA, HINDU, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC-SARPANCH, SANIVADA GRAM PANCHAYAT, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
9. BENDU HARATHI, W/O B.RAMARAO, HINDU, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC--CHAIRMAN OF MANDALA VIDYA COMMITTEE, M.P.U.P.SCHOOL, SANIVADA VILLAGE AND POST, SRIKAKULAM MANDAL AND DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRINIVAS AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra
3. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following:
3
Order:-
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition, for which, he addressed a letter dated 19.08.2025 to the Registrar (Judicial).
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
20.08.2025 PGT