210 1. RAJINDER SINGH PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT 2. RAJ SINGH PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT ROHTAK AND ORS. CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. mentioned in the heading involve common question of law in the context of common set of facts and thus they are being decided by a common order. 2. received back with the report that he is not residing at the given address and IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 22 CWP RAJINDER SINGH VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT And CWP RAJ SINGH VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT ROHTAK AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SI None for the petitioner(s). Mr. N.C Kinra, Advocate For respondent Nos.2 and 3. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Present are the set of two writ petitions, the details of which are mentioned in the heading involve common question of law in the context of common set of facts and thus they are being decided by a common order. Notice issued to the petitioner in CWP No.9765 of 200 back with the report that he is not residing at the given address and IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 22-05-2025 CWP-12214-2000 (O&M) ........Petitioner VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT ROHTAK AND ORS. ........Respondent(s) CWP-9765-2001 (O&M) ........Petitioner VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT ROHTAK AND ORS. ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) writ petitions, the details of which are mentioned in the heading involve common question of law in the context of common set of facts and thus they are being decided by a common order. Notice issued to the petitioner in CWP No.9765 of 200 back with the report that he is not residing at the given address and ........Respondent(s) ........Respondent(s) NGH SETHI writ petitions, the details of which are mentioned in the heading involve common question of law in the context of Notice issued to the petitioner in CWP No.9765 of 2001 back with the report that he is not residing at the given address and SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.22 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-12214-2000 (O&M) and other connected case -2- notice issued to the petitioner in CWP No.12214 of 2000 has not been received back served or otherwise hence, it can be safely presumed that the petitioner(s) are not interested in pursuing the present set of petitions. 3. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. 5. Photocopy of this order be placed on the file of other connected case. 22-05-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.22 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document