Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3210 (RAJ)

ANSHU GOYAL D/O SHRI SITA RAM GOYAL v. THE RAJASTHAN STAFF SELECTION BOARD

CW/758/2025 · 2025-01-17

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:2430] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 758/2025 Anshu Goyal D/o Shri Sita Ram Goyal, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Plot No.13, Meena Krishi Farm, In Front Of E-208, Murlipura Scheme Jaipur, (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur Through Its Chairman, Rajasthan Agriculture Management Institute Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur, Raj. 2. The Director, Treasury And Accounts Department, Jaipur Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC Mr. Sandeep Maheshwari HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 17/01/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the instant matter is squarely covered by the judgment dated 09.12.2024 passed by Coordinate Bench of the Court in SBCWP No.12457/2024 titled as Radheshyam Ghonsalya & Ors. Vs. RSSB, wherein petitioners were given liberty to file a representation within a period of 10 days and directions were given to the respondents to adjudicate the same. Considering the akin controversy, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed that the present writ petition be decided in light of the Radheshyam Ghonsalya (supra). [2025:RJ-JP:2430] (2 of 2) [CW-758/2025] Learned counsel for the respondents have not refuted the above-said contention. Considering the facts and circumstances of the instant matter, and considering the prayer so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this court deems it apposite to dispose of the present petition in light of the order passed in Radheshyam Ghonsalya (supra) and grants liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation within a period two weeks before the appropriate authority. Respondents are directed to adjudicate the said representation within an upper limit of four weeks from the date of filing of representation, byway of a speaking order, following the principles of natural justice, and strictly in accordance with law and governing policies. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /284