Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32083 (JHR)

BIMLA MARANDI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THRO THE SECRETARY DEPTT OF SCHEDULE TRIBE SCHEDULE CASTE MINORITY AND BACKW

WPC/7737/2023 · 2025-06-12

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:15316 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 7737 of 2023 ----- 1. Bimla Marandi, W/o Pradhan Murmu, R/o Bagshisa Jampur, P.O. & P.S.-Pakur, Dist.-Pakur 2. Bahurmuni Marandi, W/o Ram Kisku, R/o Jampur, P.O. Dangpara, P.S.-Hiranpur, Dist.-Pakur, Jharkhand … …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Schedule Tribal Schedule Cast Minority and Backward caste welfare Department having office at Project Bhawan Dhurwa, P.O-Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagannathpur, Dist.-Ranchi 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Pakur, having office at Collectariot Campus, P.O.&P.S.-Pakur, Dist.-Pakur 3. The Block Development Officer, Pakur, having office at Block Campus, Hiranpur, P.O.-Hiranpur, P.S.-Hiranpur, Dist.-Pakur … …. Respondents ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Sumit Gautam, Advocate For the State : Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, AC to G.A.-V ----- Oral Order 06 / Dated : 12.06.2025 It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the instant writ petition has been filed for benefits to the petitioners under different schemes launched by the Government for the welfare of the members of the Schedule Tribes. During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioners have received certain benefits and therefore, the petitioners do not intend to pursue the instant petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. This will, however, not preclude the right of the petitioners to claim any other relief from competent authority. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) AKT/Satendra