ARCHANA RANA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/4250/2024 · 2025-07-17
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32081 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32081 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.4250 of 2024
Decided on: 17.07.2025 _________________________________________________________________ Archana Rana and Anr.
....Petitioners
Versus State of H.P. & Ors.
…Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Parkash Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents: Ms.Leena Guleria, Deputy Advocate General. ________________________________________________________________ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
This petition has been filed for grant of following reliefs: -
“i). That the respondents may kindly be directed to treat the appointment of petitioners on regular basis from the date of their initial appointment on contract basis vide order dated 19.4.2021 at Annexure P-1, with all consequential benefits;. ii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to extend the benefit of judgement dated 22.8.2022 passed in CWPOA No. 1066/2019 titled as Nitin Kumar Vs State of HP and decision dated 19.12.2022 passed in CWP No. 5090 of 2022 titled
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
- 2 - as Umesh Jaswal Vs State of HP & connected matters and has implemented vide Annexure P-5 by the respondents. Consequently, the respondents may be directed to release all consequential benefits to the petitioners, within a time bound manner.”
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that case of the petitioner and reliefs prayed for, have already been adjudicated upon in Umesh Jaswal Vs. State of H.P. & Ors2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioner would be content if the case of the petitioners is considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid
judgment. Learned Deputy Advocate General has no objection to this prayer.
4.
Having regard to above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is
disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, in light of aforesaid decision, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioners.
2 CWP No. 5090 of 2022, decided alongwith connected matters on 19.12.2022
- 3 -
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge July 17, 2025 R.Atal