COCP-3353 IN THE HI 105 Gurinder Sin Sh. Ravi Bha CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of by the Writ including tha 3353-2025 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o der Singh and others Versus vi Bhagat and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None for the petitioners. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Sh. Satnam Singh, Sub Division PWD (B&R), Patiala and Sh. Ramanpreet Singh, Block F I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of consolidated order dated 10.09 Writ Court in CWP-17739-2018 a ing that of the petitioners, whereby it h “xxx xxx Keeping in view the petitions are allowed with the fo (i) The State Government is the land utilized by the respond rate fixed by the Government land within 3 weeks from today shall be entitled to take back th in inconvenience to the public d (ii) The process for acquisitio initiated and completed within o (iii) On completion of the ac amount assessed by the Land A paid within next 15 days from t also burdened with the cost petition. These costs shall be pa ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3353-2025 Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 .… Petitioners .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA AAG, Punjab assisted by ivisional Engineer, lock Forest Officer, Patiala. petition has been filed alleging 10.09.2021 (Annexure P-1) passed 018 and other connected petitions it had been directed as under:- xxx the aforesaid facts, these writ he following directions:- nt is directed to pay the amount of ondents at the current Collector's ent with respect to the acquired oday, failing which the petitioners ck the possession even if it results lic due to closure of road. isition of the utilized land shall be hin one year. e acquisition, the payment of the nd Acquisition Collector shall be om the date of award. The State is cost of Rs.2 lakhs in each writ e paid to petitioners…..” ging ssed rit of r's ed rs lts be he be is rit RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.05 19:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-3353 2. Engineer, P submits that (Annexure P Gurinder Si 09.04.2026 Parampreet with regard payment due to him within 3. due amount over in Cour 4. 5. the case havi 6. required to b of, according 7. 8. 04.05.2026 rishu 3353-2025 -2- On instructions from Sh. Sat eer, PWD (B&R), Patiala, learned ts that in compliance of the Writ C xure P-1); the payment(s) due to peti der Singh and Satinder Kaur, stand 2026 by way of on-line transactions. preet Singh, it is submitted that there egard to the bank account number o nt due to petitioner No. 3 has been san within 2-3 days. Copy of Speaking Order dated ount to petitioners No. 1 and 2 throug n Court is taken on record. Heard. There is no representation on be se having been called twice. In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable h. Satnam Singh, Sub Divisional rned counsel for the respondents rit Court order dated 10.09.2021 to petitioners No. 1 and 2, namely, stands released vide order dated tions. In respect of petitioner No. 3- there some correction was required ber of petitioner No. 3. However, een sanctioned and shall be released dated 09.04.2026 qua the release of through on-line transactions handed n on behalf of the petitioners despite above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No onal ents 021 ely, ated ired ver, ased e of pite are sed RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.05 19:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.