Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 8328 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-03-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR WP No. 8328 of 2025 and WMP.Nos.9338 & 9340 of 2025
1. ALAGURANI D/o.Chinnasamy, 7 th Ward, Sathi Nagar, Nullaivadi Post, Attur Town And Taluk, Salem District
2. VELMURUGAN S/o.Ariyamuthur, New Housing Board, Kurinji Nagar, No.L/278 Narasingapuram, Attur Taluk, Salem District
3. VELU S/o.Varatharaj, Ramanaickenpalayam Village, Attur Taluk, Salem District
4. NAGARAJAN S/o.L.Janakiraman, Sc/St Vigilance Cell, Salem Zone, Salem District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 8328 of 2025 Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The State Human Rights Commission Tamilnadu Rep By its Member, No.143, P.S.Kumarasamy Raja Salai, Greenways Road, Chennai-600 028 2.A.N.Panner Selvam No.21, 30 Feet Road, Balaji Nagar, Ankaputhur, Chennai-600 070 3.P.Paramasivam Pillai S/o.Bamanatha Pillai, Dharmakartha Thotta, Pananthopu Colony, Deviyakurichi Post, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District 4.K.Senthil Kumar S/o.Kumarasamy Pillai, No.1/11, North Street, Deviyakurichi Post, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District 5.R.Venkatesan S/o.Rayor Pillai, No.1/47 North Street, Deviyakurichi Post, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District Respondent(s) PRAYER Calling for the records relating to the impugned complaint dated 04.03.2024 and the consequential summon dated 06.11.2024 vide case No.5670/22/13/2024/C3 issued by the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal, non est in the eye of law. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 8328 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.K.Sriram Senior Counsel For M/s.A.Rajakumar For Respondent(s): Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh, Special Government Pleader (For R1) ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The summon issued by the State Human Rights Commission in proceedings No.5670/22/13/2024/C3, dated 06.11.2024 and the complaint dated 04.03.2024 are sought to be assailed in the present Writ Petition. 2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would mainly contend that there is no allegation in the complaint relating to infringement of human rights, and therefore, the complaint per se is not entertainable before the Human Rights Commission. Consequently, the summon issued is to be set aside. 3. No writ against a complaint or summon is entertainable in a routine manner. A Writ against summon may be entertained, only if it is issued by an incompetent authority having no jurisdiction or tainted with the allegations of malafide.
When the Human Rights Commission vests with the powers to decide its own jurisdiction, the petitioner, instead of placing all the grounds before the Commission for adjudication or closing the complaint, has erroneously chosen https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 8328 of 2025 the High Court by filing the present Writ Petition, which is not entertainable. The Human Rights Commission is empowered to adjudicate the complaint by conducting an enquiry. However, such a roving enquiry cannot be conducted by the High Court in exercise of the power of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, interference against summons may cause prejudice to the interest of all the parties or deprive them from adjudicating the issues on merits. Thus, the High Court is expected to be cautious, while entertaining such Writ Petitions in exercise of the powers of judicial review or preventing the original forum to adjudicate the issues on merits based on the documents and evidences available on record. 4. Thus, the arguments raised by the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner are neither candid nor convincing. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed, with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the grounds before the State Human Rights Commission. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. (S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.)(K.RAJASEKAR J.) 10-03-2025 gd Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 8328 of 2025 To 1.The State Human Rights Commission Tamilnadu Rep By Its Member, No.143, P.S.Kumarasamy Raja Salai, Greenways Road, Chennai-600 028 2.A.Panner Selvam No.21, 30 Feet Road, Balaji Nagar, Ankaputhur, Chennai-600 070 3.P.Paramasivam Pillai S/o.Bamanatha Pillai, Dharmakartha Thotta, Pananthopu Colony, Deviyakurichi Post, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District 4.K.Senthil Kumar S/o.Kumarasamy Pillai, No.1/11, North Street, Deviyakurichi Post, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District 5.R.Venkatesan S/o.Rayor Pillai, No.1/47 North Street, Deviyakurichi Post, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 8328 of 2025 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND K.RAJASEKAR J. gd WP No. 8328 of 2025
10-03-2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis