Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32076 (DEL)

SMT RAM KALI v. SMT MADHU

C.R.P./361/2024 · 2025-07-29

Tara Vitasta Ganju

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 361/2024, CM APPL. 20221/2025 SMT RAM KALI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate versus SMT MADHU .....Respondent Through: Mr.Vishal Maurya, Advocate along with Respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU O R D E R % 29.07.2025 1. A request for an adjournment is made on behalf of the learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent. It is stated that he is travelling. 2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner also requests for some time to comply with the Order dated 24.04.2025. 3. Let the needful be done, at least, one week before the next date of hearing. 4. At the request of the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, list on 27.01.2026. TARA VITASTA GANJU, J JULY 29, 2025/g.joshi This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/08/2025 at 12:43:31