2025:JHHC:26118 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 1095 of 2023 Miss. Mita Mukherjee, aged about 67 years, daughter of Late Prabhat Mukherjee, resident of 19, G-B, Kali Kumar Banerjee Lane, KMC, Chitpur, P.O. Kashipur, P.S. Chitpur, District Kolkata, West Bengal, Pin – Code - 700002 … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Superintendent Excise, Palamu cum Latehar, Daltonganj, Palamu, P.O. Daltonganj Head, P.S. Daltonganj, District Palamu, Pin Code – 822101 3. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Prohibition Excise and Registration, Department Govt. of Bihar 4. Office of Accountant General, (A& E), Bihar, Bihar, Patna Veerchand Patel Path, P.O. – GPO, P.S. Shastri Nagar 800001 5. Office of the Accountant General (A&E), Jharkhand P.O. – Doranda, P.S. – Doranda, Jharkhand … … Opp. Parties --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party Nos.4 &5 : Mr. Sudarshan Shrivastava, Adv. For the State of Bihar : Mr. Ranjit Kumar, AC to GA, Bihar For the State of Jharkhand : Mr. Binit Chandra, AC to AAG --- 15/29.08.2025 The learned counsels for the parties are present. 2. This petition has been filed for initiation of a contempt proceedings against the opposite parties for non-compliance of order dated 02.11.2022, passed in W.P.(S) No. 278 of 2020, and the order dated 19.05.2023 passed in CMP No.941 of 2022. 3. The learned counsel for the respondent nos.4 and 5 has submitted that he has received instruction over the phone, which is to the following effect: - “In terms of Joint Secretary, Prohibition, Excise and Registration Department, Govt. of Bihar letter no.3367 dated – 20.06.2025 O/o the Patna A.G issued Special Seal Authority (SSA) vide no.Pen – 11/92414P2 dated – 21.07.2025 and accordingly this office issued Family Pension 2025:JHHC:26118 2 revision order vide application no.1525210218 dated 14.08.2025.” 4. The learned counsel submits that now there is no impediment in releasing payment to the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner has to go to the treasury office at Ranchi to do the needful so that the pension is released in her favour. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondent nos.4 and 5, this Court is not inclined to proceed any further in this contempt proceeding, which is hereby dropped. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Saurav