1 2025:CGHC:14496 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4131 of 2024 1 - Iqbal Beg S/o. Issub Beg Aged About 34 Years R/o. Village - Litia, Tahsil - Bori, District - Durg (C.G.) 2 - Manoj Sahu S/o. Dhan Sai Aged About 47 Years R/o. Village - Jogigupha, Post - Litia, Tahsil - Bori, District - Durg (C.G.) 3 - Vivek Madhariya S/o. Niranjan Madhariya Aged About 31 Years R/o. Village - Litia, Tahsil - Bori, District - Durg (C.G.) 4 - Santosh Sinha S/o. Manharan Sinha Aged About 49 Years R/o. Village - Bhothi, Tahsil - Jalbandha, District - Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan- Gandai (Kcg) (C.G.) 5 - Manish Dewangan S/o. Sumran Lal Dewangan Aged About 34 Years R/o. Ganjpara, Ward No. 35, Durg, District-Durg (C.G.) 6 - Mahesh Dewangan S/o. Sumran Lal Dewangan Aged About 36 Years R/o. Ganjpara, Ward No. 35, Durg, District-Durg (C.G.) 7 - Vijay Dewangan S/o. Sumran Lal Dewangan Aged About 39 Years R/o. Ganjpara, Ward No. 35, Durg, District-Durg (C.G.) 8 - Khileshwar Deshmukh S/o. Ltd. Kamta Prasad Deshmukh Aged About 28 Years R/o. Village - Bori, Tahsil - Bori, District - Durg (C.G.) 9 - Kirtan Shrivas S/o. Phoolchand Shrivas Aged About 30 Years R/o. Village - Dodki, Tahsil - Bori, District - Durg (C.G.) 10 - Lok Prakash Sahu S/o. Santram Sahu Aged About 32 Years R/o. Village - Bijetala, District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.04.05 12:57:59 +0530 2 11 - Dharmo Ram Sinha S/o. Ramlal Sinha Aged About 46 Years (Proprietor Of Sinha Traders), R/o. Village - Jagigufa, District - Durg (C.G.) 12 - Bhagchand Dahariya S/o. Toran Lal Dahariya Aged About 32 Years R/o. Village - Litia, Tahsil - Bori, District - Durg (C.G.) 13 - Santosh Kumar Verma S/o. Late Arjun Verma Aged About 35 Years R/o. Village - Chicha, Tahsil - Bori, District - Durg (C.G.) 14 - Kishorilal Verma S/o. Hemsingh Verma Aged About 35 Years R/o. Village - Chicha, Tahsil - Bori, District - Durg (C.G.) 15 - Roopesh Shrivas S/o. Chandrika Shrivas Aged About 28 Years R/o. Village - Sameriya Litia, Tahsil - Bori, District - Durg (C.G.) 16 - Rajeev Dwivedi S/o. Late Shri Lal Bihari Aged About 45 Years R/o. Village - Bhothi, Bhilai, District - Durg (C.G.) 17 - Chetan Kumar Deshmukh S/o. Late Shri Khuman Singh Deshmukh Aged About 29 Years R/o. Village And Post - Bori, P.S. - Bori, District - Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of Water Resource And Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector Durg, District - Durg (C.G.) 4 - Executive Engineer Water Resource Department, Durg, District - Durg (C.G.) 5 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Water Resource Department) Dhamdha, District - Durg (C.G.) 6 - Sub Divisional Officer (Rev) Dhamdha, District - Durg (C.G.) 3 7 - Naib Tahsildar Tahsil - Bori, District - Durg (C.G.) 8 - Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Jogigupha, Tahsil Dhamdha, District - Durg (C.G.) 9 - Secretary Gram Panchayat Jogigupha, Tahsil Dhamdha, District - Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravipal Maheshwari, Advocate For State/Respondent/s : Mr. Satish Gupta, Government Advocate For Respondents No.8 & 9 : Ms. Aditi Joshi, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra K ishore Prasad Order on Board 26/03/2025 1. Heard Mr. Ravipal Maheshwari, learned counsel for the petitioner/s. Also heard Mr. Satish Gupta, learned Government Advocate for State/respondent/s as well as Ms. Aditi Joshi, learned counsel for the respondents No.8 & 9. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they have deposited amount for construction of shops for running their livelihood to the Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Jogigupha. Though he has constructed the shops, but since the shops were constructed on government land, as such it was demolished by the State Authorities. Now, the petitioners have filed this petition with the prayer that the Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Jogigupha and the other authorities of Gram Panchayat, Jogigupha be directed to construct shops and to allot them in accordance with 4 law. 3. On the other hand, learned State counsel has not objected the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the facts that the petitioners have deposited amount for construction of shops for running their livelihood to the Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Jogigupha, the petitioners are directed to file an application before the concerned Gram Panchayat raising their grievances which has been raised in this petition and in turn the concerned Gram Panchayat and the other authorities relating to said Gram Panchayat are directed to consider the same and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of sixty days. 6. With the aforementioned observation and direction, writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi