Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32068 (RAJ)

RAMNIWAS S/O SHRI PANNA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/7114/2024 · 2025-01-21

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7114/2024 Ramniwas S/o Shri Panna, R/o Dolada, Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawaimadhopur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Director General of Police, Rajasthan P.H.Q. Lalkothi, Jaipur. 3. Superintendent Of Police, District Sawaimadhopur. 4. S.H.O. Police Station Soorwal, District Sawaimadhopur. 5. Nasira S/o Samir, R/o Dubbi Khurd, P.S. Soorwal, District Sawaimadhopur. 6. Badru S/o Nasira, R/o Dubbi Khurd, P.S. Soorwal, District Sawaimadhopur. 7. Sufiyan S/o Sartaj, R/o Dubbi Khurd, P.S. Soorwal, District Sawaimadhopur. 8. Sartaj S/o Samir, R/o Dubbi Khurd, P.S. Soorwal, District Sawaimadhopur. 9. Garur @ Sabir S/o Himayat Ali, R/o Dubbi Khurd, P.S. Soorwal, District Sawaimadhopur. 10. Nijamat Ali S/o Himayat Ali, R/o Dubbi Khurd, P.S. Soorwal, District Sawaimadhopur. 11. Shahid S/o Mukhtiyar, R/o Dubbi Khurd, P.S. Soorwal, District Sawaimadhopur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Chand Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 21/01/2025 (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7114/2024] 1. Instant criminal misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the Investigating Agency for conducting a fair and impartial investigation in FIR No. 266/2023 registered with Police Station for the Soorwal, District Sawaimadhopur for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B and 447 of IPC. 2. This Court vide order dated 25.10.2024 directed the learned Public Prosecutor to get the factual report of the investigation conducted in the matter. In pursuance of the aforesaid order passed by this Court, the learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the factual report furnished by the SHO Police Station, Soorval which indicates that after investigation in the matter, the case is found to be civil nature and Final Report (Negative) has been proposed, hence under these circumstances, this criminal misc. petition has become infructuous. 3. At this stage, counsel for the complainant submits that a liberty be granted to the petitioner to file appropriate application/protest petition before the trial Court. 4. The criminal misc. petition stands dismissed with the liberty aforesaid. 5. The factual report is ordered to be retained on record. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/114