S. Rajasekhar Deekshithulu, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/3419/2013 · 2025-01-08
K Manmadha Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32068 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32068 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010470912013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310] WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3419/2013 Between: S. Rajasekhar Deekshithulu, ...PETITIONER AND The Government Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MD SALEEM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V B SUBRAHMANYAM
2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following:
ORDER: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr Md Salem, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.
2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands closed.
_________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J. Date: 08.01.2025 TM