Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32065 (RAJ)

VINOD OJHA S/O LATE SH. BHAGCHAND OJHA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/16798/2024 · 2025-04-07

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:16474] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16798/2024 1. Vinod Ojha S/o Late Sh. Bhagchand Ojha, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Chhoti Basti Pushkar, Tehsil Pushkar District Ajmer. 2. Smt. Rajesh Kumari W/o Late Sh. Bhagchand Ojha, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Chhoti Basti Pushkar, Tehsil Pushkar District Ajmer. 3. Pawan Ojha S/o Late Sh. Bhagchand Ojha, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Chhoti Basti Pushkar, Tehsil Pushkar District Ajmer. 4. Smt. Sangeeta Sharma D/o Late Sh. Bhagchand Ojha W/o Sh. Manoj Kumar Sharma, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Shahpura, District Bhilwara. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector, Ajmer. 2. Tehsildar, Pushkar, District Ajmer. 3. Adhishashi Adhikari Nagar Palika, Pushkar, District Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.C. Chirania HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 17/04/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners were tenants of the land in question but inadvertently, said land was entered in the name of Nagar Palika, Pushkar on 22.10.1986 by District Collector, Ajmer. It is submitted that after having knowledge about this transfer, said order was challenged by the petitioners by way of filing Appeal (LR) No.61/2020 before Divisional Commissioner, Ajmer and said appeal was accepted vide [2025:RJ-JP:16474] (2 of 2) [CW-16798/2024] order dated 05.10.2021 in favor of the petitioners. It is submitted that in pursuance of order dated 05.10.2021, an application was filed by the petitioners on 21.12.2022 to enter their names in revenue records but till date, no action has been taken on the said application. In these circumstances, authorities are required to be directed to pass an order on application filed by the petitioners as petitioners cannot be deprived from fruits of successful litigation. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition with the direction to the petitioners to submit fresh detailed application before the concerned authority raising their grievance within a period of three weeks from today. If any such application is filed within a period of three weeks from today along with certified copy of this order and the material submitted along with application, authority concerned is directed to pass a reasoned order on such application within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /80