159 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT TARLOCHAN SINGH VIMAL SETIA IAS AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Harbans Sharma, Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab Mr. Aditya Sharda, Advocate and Mr. Abhivadaya Sood, HARKESH MANUJA Learned counsel for the though a response to legal notice dated 13.09.2024 was sent to the counsel representing the petitioner giving the reasons for rejecting the claim, however, the same shall thereof shall be handed over the petitioner within In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. In case the petitioner is found entitled, the p released in his favour in terms of the Writ Court order. Rule discharged. 10.07.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: TARLOCHAN SINGH Versus VIMAL SETIA IAS AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Harbans Sharma, Advocate for the Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab Mr. Aditya Sharda, Advocate and Mr. Abhivadaya Sood, Advocate for **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondent No.5 though a response to legal notice dated 13.09.2024 was sent to the counsel representing the petitioner giving the reasons for rejecting the claim, however, the same shall be formulated as an order and a copy thereof shall be handed over the petitioner within In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. In case the petitioner is found entitled, the p released in his favour in terms of the Writ Court order. Rule discharged. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1209-2025 Date of Decision: July 10, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Aditya Sharda, Advocate and Advocate for respondent No.5. respondent No.5 submits that though a response to legal notice dated 13.09.2024 was sent to the counsel representing the petitioner giving the reasons for rejecting the be formulated as an order and a copy thereof shall be handed over the petitioner within two weeks from today. In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition In case the petitioner is found entitled, the payment shall be released in his favour in terms of the Writ Court order. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2025 July 10, 2025 submits that though a response to legal notice dated 13.09.2024 was sent to the counsel representing the petitioner giving the reasons for rejecting the be formulated as an order and a copy In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition ayment shall be TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.07.12 08:22 I agree to specified portions of this document