1 2025:CGHC:18643 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3873 of 2022 1 - Shivshankar Sahu S/o Late Khobahara Sahu Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Baihar, Police Station And Tahsil Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Bhojram Sahu S/o Bisahu Ram Sahu Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Baihar, Police Station And Tahsil Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Ganesh Sahu S/o Late Bhagatram Sahu Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Baihar, Police Station And Tahsil Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Munna Lal Sahu S/o Late Gopal Sahu Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Baihar, Police Station And Tahsil Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat And Social Welfare Department , Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nava Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Collector District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sub Divisional Officer Arang District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Smt. Nirmala Sahu S/o Shri Mansukh Sahu Aged About 52 Years (Ex Sarpanch) R/o Village Baihar, Police Station And Tahsil Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5 - Smt. Bindu Kosle W/o Shri Hiraman Kosle (Ex Up Sarpanch) , R/o Village Baihar, Police Station And Tahsil Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 6 - Puroshottam Patel S/o Unknown Aged About 45 Years Ex Secretary (Gram Panchayat Baihar) , Presently Posted At Janpad Panchayat Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Nupoor Sonkar, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 24/04/2025 1. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 2. An application for urgent hearing is taken for consideration and order has been passed. 3 3. The petitioner is a complainant, he has made a complaint before the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Arang, Raipur and other authorities stating that the respondents No. 4, 5 & 6 who are authorities of Panchayat have committed misappropriate of funds and they have not conducted the work assigned and as such necessary action would be required to be taken against them. Upon this, the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Arang, Raipur has conducted an enquiry and after due enquiry order has been passed stating that the complaint as set forth by the complainant has not been proved. Thereafter, the said order of the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Arang, Raipur dated 27.09.2021 was challenged before the Additional Collector, Raipur and vide order dated 28.06.2022, the Additional Collector, Raipur has passed an order stating that the order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Arang, Raipur is in accordance with law and it is not required to be interfered with against that this petition has been filed. 4. I have perused the order as well as record of the case. 5. From the perusal of record, there is nothing to show that the two Courts below have committed any illegality for passing the orders ,the petitioner is a mere complainant his locus is also not to challenge the said orders, the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Arang, Raipur has conducted an enquiry and passed well 4 reasoned order which is not required to be interfered with. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is being devoid of merits is dismissed and is hereby dismissed. 7. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat