Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32052 (KAR)

MS/ SRI VIJAYADURGA INDUSTRIES v. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER

WP/47872/2018 · 2025-02-06

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5454 WP No. 47872 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 47872 OF 2018 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. SRI VIJAYADURGA INDUSTRIES, REPRESENTED BY ITS: MANAGING PARTNER: G.SESHAIAH, S/O G.RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT 005-GROUND FLOOR, SOHUM ISIRI, NO.43/5, BORE WELL ROAD, WHITEFIELD, BENGALURU-560 066. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.A.ANTHONY CRUZE., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER/ AUTHORIZED OFFICER, ANDHRA BANK, NO.487, 19TH MAIN ROAD, NEAR SANJAY GANDHI HOSPITAL, 4TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 041. 2. THE ZONAL MANAGER, ANDHRA BANK, ZONAL OFFICE, 1ST FLOOR, SWARNA CITY CENTRE, NEAR RAILWAY STATION ROAD, HUBBALLI-580 020. 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER, ANDHRA BANK, KARATAGI BRANCH, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5454 WP No. 47872 of 2018 GANGAVATHI TALUK, KOPPAL DISTRICT-583 229. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VASANTH.S.KOPPAR & SRI. PRASHANTH.M.S., ADVOCATES FOR SRI. R.V.NAIK., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & 3; R1-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.G.A.Anthony Cruze., counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner about infructuous of the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5454 WP No. 47872 of 2018 The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 21