APHC010470552002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22040/2002 Between: 1. B.SRINIVASULU, S/O. B. VEMA RAJU DRIVER, E.411725, R/O.PRODDATUR, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE A P S R T C ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DEPOT MANAGER, A.P.S.R.T.C., PRODDATUR DEPOT, PRODDATUR, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the removal orders deleting the name of the petitioner from the Casual Drivers Approved List [Selected List] in proceedings No.M1/1[43]/2002-PDTR dated 16.10.2002 passed by the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and contrary to the CCA Regulations and law and consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 27623 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service as Driver/pay the wages for the unpaid period from June, 2002 to till date i.e., October, 2002, under Revised Pay scales from April, 2001 to till date and continue to pay the wages till the disposal of Criminal Case CC.No.67/2002 on the file of the District Sessions Court, Cuddapah, in case of conviction by the trial court pending consideration of petitioner's appeal until the appeal is disposed off finally one way of other by suspending the proceedings No.M1/1[43]/2002- PDTR dated 16.10.2002 pending disposal of writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S A K MYNUDDIN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P VINAYAKA SWAMY The Court made the following: ORDER: On 30.07.2024, notice was ordered to the petitioner on the ground that the learned counsel for the petitioner is no more. Notice sent by the Registry was returned with an endorsement ‘no such person in the address’. This being old matter and as the petitioner is not evincing interest in prosecuting the case, on 07.07.2025, the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. 2. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 17th July, 2025 RKS