Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32047 (PNJ)

BHUPINDER SINGH v. KASHMIRI LAL KALRA

FAO/5265/2002 · 2025-09-25

Virinder Aggarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

FAO-5265-2002 (O&M) -:1:- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (212) FAO-5265-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision:-25.09.2025 BHUPINDER SINGH AND OTHERS … Appellants Versus KASHMIRI LAL KALRA AND ANOTHER ... Respondents **** CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- None for the appellants. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral) 1. As per office report, notice issued to respondent No.1 has been returned unserved, with the report indicating that the address is incorrect. On call, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants, and no documents have been filed on record to indicate any updated or traceable address for respondent No.1. It is also observed that this is an old matter, falling under the category of fully burnt cases, where considerable time has already lapsed. In view of the foregoing, it appears that the appellants are not inclined to actively pursue the present appeal. 2. In view of the foregoing and considering the prevailing circumstances, it appears that there is no justification for keeping the appeal pending on the docket indefinitely. Despite repeated efforts, the appellants have failed to pursue the appeal, and the learned counsel has been unable to furnish any traceable address for service. In such circumstances, in the interest of expeditious disposal of cases and judicial propriety, the instant GAURAV SOROT 2025.09.26 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document FAO-5265-2002 (O&M) -:2:- appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. However, the appellants are granted liberty to revive the appeal, if aggrieved by this order, within a period of ‘three months’ from the date hereof, subject to compliance with all procedural requirements. 3. In view of the adjudication of the main case, any and all pending miscellaneous applications, if remaining, are also disposed of in consequence thereof, and no further directions are required in respect of such applications. ( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 25.09.2025 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No GAURAV SOROT 2025.09.26 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document