Sri Devara Suri Appa Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/23854/2025 · 2025-09-08
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32046 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32046 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010470442025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 23854/2025 Between:
1. SRI DEVARA SURI APPA RAO,, S/O LATE DEVARA APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, D.NO.8-148,
0PP. GVMC, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM.
2. SRI DEVARA TRINADH,, S/O LATE DEVARA APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, D.NO.8-148, 0PP. GVMC, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM.
3. SRI DEVARA SURESH,, S/O LATE RAMBABU, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, D.NO.9-25, SRIVALLI NAGAR, 0PP. ELECTRICAL OFFICE, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM.
4. SRI DEVARA RAMESH, , S/O LATE RAMBABU, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, D.NO.9-26, SRIVALLI NAGAR, 0PP. ELECTRICAL OFFICE, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM.
5. SMT. DEVARA APPAIA NARASAMMA,, D/O LATE RAMBABU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, D.NO.9-26, SRIVALLI NAGAR,
0PP.
ELECTRICAL OFFICE, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM. REP.
BY THEIR GPA HOLDER, GODAVARTHI RAMAKRISHNA RAO, S/O LATE VENKANNA, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O HO.NO.14-10-2/7, BC ROAD, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI.
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , RSP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI.
3. THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, ANDHRA PRADESH INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION LTD.
(APIIC), VIJAYAWADA.
4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, ANDHRA PRADESH TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LTD. (APTS) VIJAYAWADA.
5. THE DIRECTOR OF SURVEY AND SETTLEMENTS, 4TH FLOOR, APIIC BUILDINGS, MANGALAGIRI.
6. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
7. THE TAHSILDAR, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL MANDAL.
8. THE VICE CHAIRMAN, VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (VUDA), VISAKHAPATNAM.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SHAIK ASIF Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. G P FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AP
3. HARINATH REDDY SOMA The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Sri N. Subba Rao, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Shaik Asif,
learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to file fresh Writ Petition.
2. Permission granted.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh Writ Petition, if so advised. No order as to costs.
4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 09.09.2025 DSV
442
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 23854/2025
09.09.2025
DSV
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 23854/2025 PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. No
DATE
ORDER Office Note
01.
09.09.2025 GRKP, J
Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (vide separate order)
___________
GRKP, J DSV