SRI. A C NAGARAJ S/O G CHANNAPPA v. SMT. MUNIYAMMA W/O MUNIDODDAPPA
RSA/1262/2011 · 2025-03-26
Ravi V Hosmani
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32045 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32045 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12802 RSA No.1262 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1262/2011 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. A.C. NAGARAJ S/O G. CHANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS.
2.
SRI. NARAYANAPPA S/O LATE SUBBANNA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS.
3.
SMT. DODDAMUNIYAMMA W/O LATE PILLAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS.
ALL ARE R/AT. AVATHI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562101.
…APPELLANTS (V/O/DTD:8.10.2021 a) SERVICE OF NOTICE TO A1 & A3 ARE H/S b) A1 & A3 ARE H/S c) A2 IS EXPIRED)
AND:
1.
SMT. MUNIYAMMA W/O MUNIDODDAPPA AGED 50 YEARS R/AT. DINNUR, CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562101.
2.
SMT. HANUMAKKA
Digitally signed by ARSHIFA BAHAR KHANAM Location: High Court of karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12802 RSA No.1262 of 2011
W/O SONNAPPA AGED 47 YEARS R/O. GOBBARAGUNTE KASABA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.D.N. PRASAD & SRI. M.N. UMESH, ADVS., FOR R1 & R2)
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT & DECREE DTD 23.2.2011 PASSED IN R.A.NO.48/2009 ON THE FILE OF PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT, DEVANAHALLI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD 9.11.2009 PASSED IN OS.NO.349/2002 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for respondents is present.
2. As per order dated 06.03.2020, Court notice was issued to appellants. Service was noted in order dated
08.10.2021. Till date, alternate arrangement is not made.
3. Names called out. There is no representation.
4. It is also seen that appellant no.2 was noted to have been dead, steps are not taken. This would indicate that
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12802 RSA No.1262 of 2011
appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Therefore, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
ABK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2