1 2025:CGHC:31367 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6849 of 2025 1 - Hemant Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Gopiram Sahu Aged About 34 Years R/o House No. H-3 C.M.H.O. Office Premises Seepat Road, Sarkanda District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department , Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Chief Medical And Health Office Bilaspur District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - The Civil Surgeon District Hospital Bilaspur District - Bilsapur (C.G.) 4 - Yogesh Kumar Sahu Posted As Medical Lab Technologist Primary Health Centre Lemru District- Korba (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vimlesh Bajpai, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Anmol Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 08/07/2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition claiming for the following reliefs:- VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.09 19:06:49 +0530 2 “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/ order, thereby setting- aside/quashing the impugned order dated 26.06.2025 (Annexure P/1) so far it relates to petitioner and further be please to direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to continue at his present place of posting. 10.2 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.” 2. After arguing for sometimes, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, there is a provision under clause 8 of the transfer policy dated 05-06-2025 for making a representation before the transfer committee. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to move his representation before the said transfer committee and the said transfer committee may be directed to decide the representation, so filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law within the stipulated time frame. 3. The submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the State counsel and would submit that he has no objection, if such a direction is to be given to the transfer committee to decide the representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within the stipulated time frame. 4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to make 3 his representation before the transfer committee as provided under clause 8 of the said transfer policy dated 05-06-2025, and if such representation is made to the said committee, the same shall be decided in accordance with law on its own merits within a further period of one month from the date of receipt of the representation along with the copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid observation, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved