(1) 924 CP-733.2015.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 733 OF 2015 IN WP/9983/2014 RAVINDRA MADHUSUDAN KHANPURKAR VERSUS NANDAKUMAR AND OTHERS ....... Mr. R.R. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Shinde, A.P.P. for the respondent-State. Ms. Nayana Patil, Advocate holding for Ms. Surekha Mahajan, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 to 5. Mr. Kalyan V. Patil, Advocate for respondent No.4. Mr. Rahul Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent No.6. ....... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ. DATED : 31 JULY 2025 ORDER:- 1. Since the disputed question of facts are involved in the present contempt petition, we refuse to entertain the contempt petition. 2. Contempt petition is, therefore, dismissed. 3. Petitioner is at liberty to recover his arrears of salary, if he is found entitled to, by adopting appropriate legal proceedings. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde