CRM-M-14446 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 263 Mohd. Moin State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE MR Present: Mr Mr. for the petitioner. Mr. None for respondent No.3. *** NAMIT KUMAR 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.033 dated 03.02.2023 under Section 346 IPC (Section 346 were added and was added) registered at Police Station Mund Kati, District Palwal and all subsequent proceedings arising thereform. 2. On the last date of hearing i.e.1 passed:- 21.03.2024 respondent No.1 whereas in appearance on behalf of respondent vakalatnama. 14446-2024 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of Decision: Versus Haryana and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR r. Aazam Khan, Advocate Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kshitiz Bharati, AAG, Haryana. None for respondent No.3. *** NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of FIR No.033 dated 03.02.2023 under Section IPC (Section 346 IPC was deleted later on, Sections 363, 366, 376 and, thereafter, Section 376D IPC was deleted and Section 376 IPC was added) registered at Police Station Mund Kati, District Palwal and all subsequent proceedings arising thereform. n the last date of hearing i.e.18.0 “Notice of motion in the present case was issued on 21.03.2024 and learned State counsel had accepted notice for respondent No.1 whereas Mr. Dushyant Rana, Advocate had put in appearance on behalf of respondent vakalatnama. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M-14446-2024 Date of Decision:28.07.2025 ... Petitioner ... Respondents NAMIT KUMAR Kshitiz Bharati, AAG, Haryana. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section seeking quashing of FIR No.033 dated 03.02.2023 under Section later on, Sections 363, 366, 376-D IPC was deleted and Section 376 IPC was added) registered at Police Station Mund Kati, District Palwal and all 8.02.2025, the following order was in the present case was issued on and learned State counsel had accepted notice for Mr. Dushyant Rana, Advocate had put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.3 and also filed his s under Section seeking quashing of FIR No.033 dated 03.02.2023 under Section D IPC was deleted and Section 376 IPC was added) registered at Police Station Mund Kati, District Palwal and all .2025, the following order was in the present case was issued on and learned State counsel had accepted notice for Mr. Dushyant Rana, Advocate had put No.3 and also filed his PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.07.29 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh CRM-M-14446 11.07.2024. process to file ordered to be issued opportunity to file the process fee qua respondent No.2. to be Chandigarh. returnable on 28.07.2025. 3. As per office report, notice for want of process fee. opportunity to file the process fee, however, concedes to the fact that Rs.5000/- as was ordered to be deposited vide order dated 18. Poor Patients Welfare Fund, PGIMER, Chandigarh, has not been deposited so far. 4. In this view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. July 28, 2025 Pankaj* 14446-2024 -2- Notice was ordered to be 11.07.2024. However, since, counsel for the petitioner did not file process fee, notice could not be issued to respondent No.2. Again on 11.07.2024, counsel for the petitioner undertook to file process fee within a period of ordered to be issued to respondent No.2 for today. Today also, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks another opportunity to file the process fee qua respondent No.2. Prayer is accepted, subject to payment of costs of to be paid to the Poor Patients Welfare Fund, PGIMER, Chandigarh. Let the needful be done within a period of one week. On his doing so, fresh notice be issued to respondent No.2, returnable on 28.07.2025.” As per office report, notice could not be issued to respondent No.2 for want of process fee. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks another opportunity to file the process fee, however, concedes to the fact that as was ordered to be deposited vide order dated 18. Poor Patients Welfare Fund, PGIMER, Chandigarh, has not been deposited so In this view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed for prosecution. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Notice was ordered to be issued to respondent No.2 for However, since, counsel for the petitioner did not file fee, notice could not be issued to respondent No.2. Again on 11.07.2024, counsel for the petitioner undertook process fee within a period of two weeks and notice was to respondent No.2 for today. Today also, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks another opportunity to file the process fee qua respondent No.2. Prayer is accepted, subject to payment of costs of Rs.5000/- paid to the Poor Patients Welfare Fund, PGIMER, Let the needful be done within a period of one week. On his doing so, fresh notice be issued to respondent No.2, could not be issued to respondent No.2 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks another opportunity to file the process fee, however, concedes to the fact that costs of as was ordered to be deposited vide order dated 18.02.2025 with Poor Patients Welfare Fund, PGIMER, Chandigarh, has not been deposited so In this view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed for (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No : Yes/No issued to respondent No.2 for However, since, counsel for the petitioner did not file Again on 11.07.2024, counsel for the petitioner undertook two weeks and notice was - paid to the Poor Patients Welfare Fund, PGIMER, could not be issued to respondent No.2 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks another costs of 02.2025 with Poor Patients Welfare Fund, PGIMER, Chandigarh, has not been deposited so In this view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed for PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.07.29 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh