IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 226 YOG RAJ GARG STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) 1. 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0007 dated 29.08.2020, under Sections 420, 406, 120 1860, registered at Police Station NRI, 2. anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation and the relevant part of the said order reads as under: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM- Date of decision: May 22 YOG RAJ GARG Versus STATE OF PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Pardeep Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG, Punjab With ASI Sukhdev Singh. Mr. Jagdeep Singh, Advocate for the complainant. MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0007 dated 29.08.2020, under Sections 420, 406, 120 1860, registered at Police Station NRI, District Ferozepur (Annexure P On 03.04.2025, the petitioner had been granted interim anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation and the relevant part of the said order reads as under: - “Learned counsel appearing for the complainant d dispute the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner on the last date of hearing that the parties have indeed amicably resolved all their disputes. He also does not oppose the prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner for extending the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -M-12765-2025 Date of decision: May 22, 2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondent HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG, Punjab The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0007 dated 29.08.2020, under Sections 420, 406, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, District Ferozepur (Annexure P-1). .2025, the petitioner had been granted interim anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation and the relevant part of Learned counsel appearing for the complainant does not dispute the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner on the last date of hearing that the parties have indeed amicably resolved all their disputes. He also does not oppose the prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner for extending e concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.” ...Petitioner ...Respondent The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0007 B of the Indian Penal Code, .2025, the petitioner had been granted interim anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation and the relevant part of oes not dispute the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner on the last date of hearing that the parties have indeed amicably resolved all their disputes. He also does not oppose the prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner for extending Jaspreet Kaur 2025.05.22 18:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-12765 3. compliance of order dated and cooperated with the investigating agency. 4. factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency is not required for further investigation, much less for his custodial interrogation. 5. dated 03.04.2025, is made absolute subject Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./482(2) BNSS. May 22, 2025 Jaspreet Kaur 12765-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated that in compliance of order dated 03.04.2025, the petitioner has joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner is not required for further investigation, much less for his custodial interrogation. In view of the above, the petition is allowed, and interim order .2025, is made absolute subject Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./482(2) BNSS. May 22, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated that in .2025, the petitioner has joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the . He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner is not required for further investigation, much less for his custodial In view of the above, the petition is allowed, and interim order to the conditions laid down in (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated that in .2025, the petitioner has joined investigation Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the . He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner is not required for further investigation, much less for his custodial In view of the above, the petition is allowed, and interim order to the conditions laid down in Jaspreet Kaur 2025.05.22 18:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh