207 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DR JASBIR SINGH KUMAR RAHUL IAS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- VIKRAM AGGARWAL 29.01.2025 (Annexure P the grievance of the petitioner within a period of four months. 2. said order. 3. of Punjab has furnished a copy of the revised speaking order dated 19.09.2025 passed in compliance with the directions issued vide order dated 29.01.2025 copy thereof has been supplied to lea 4. that he does not press the contempt petition as no grievance subsists IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3413- Date of Decision: DR JASBIR SINGH Versus KUMAR RAHUL IAS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Sr. Advocate Ms. Priya Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shiny Chopra, AAG, Punjab. VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J.(Oral) CWP-2406-2025 was disposed of vide order dated (Annexure P-1) with a direction to take a final decision on the grievance of the petitioner within a period of four months. The instant contempt petition alleges disobedience of the At the outset, learned State counsel repre of Punjab has furnished a copy of the revised speaking order dated .2025 passed in compliance with the directions issued vide order 29.01.2025. The same is taken on record as ‘Mark copy thereof has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. That being so, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not press the contempt petition as no grievance subsists IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -2025 Date of Decision: 13.01.2026 …Petitioner KUMAR RAHUL IAS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY & ORS …Respondents VIKRAM AGGARWAL Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Sr. Advocate Ms. Shiny Chopra, AAG, Punjab. 2025 was disposed of vide order dated 1) with a direction to take a final decision on the grievance of the petitioner within a period of four months. The instant contempt petition alleges disobedience of the At the outset, learned State counsel representing the State of Punjab has furnished a copy of the revised speaking order dated .2025 passed in compliance with the directions issued vide order . The same is taken on record as ‘Mark-X’ and a rned counsel for the petitioner. That being so, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not press the contempt petition as no grievance subsists HIMANSHU 2026.01.14 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-3413-2025 -2- and the petitioner shall, if so advised, avail all such remedies as shall be admissible in law against the said order. 5. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present contempt petition is disposed of as not having been pressed. Rule stands discharged. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE 13.01.2026 himanshu Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No HIMANSHU 2026.01.14 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document